I was just doing some research on the web and stumbled across an article about Richmond Mining (ASX:RHM).
http://www.goldprices.net.au/tag/iron-ore
They are an iron ore producer in the US (listed on the ASX). They just released their DFS in May this year and their project has the following attributes: - capital expenditure of US$161 million - output of 1.75 Mtpa - 10 year mine life - producing a concentrate grading 66-69%Fe - cost of production is US$66/t
Compare to PLV, which has
- capital expenditure of AU$700 million - output of 4.4 Mtpa - 20+ yr mine life - producing a concentrate grading ~67%Fe -cost of production is AU$63/t
So the 2 projects are very similar. PLVs Capex is higher, but it has much greater output and a much longer mine life than RHM. Look at the capex:output ratio: - RHM: US$92 million per Mt of output annually - PLV: $AU159 million per Mt of output annually
Not ridiculously higher given that the mine life is twice that of RHM.