I will beat Db to the post and give both Yaq and Acorn a solid thumbs up!
That's what i've been jumping up and down going red in the face saying
Tintsfield is UP AND RUNNING
We have our first lot of reserves posted by MHA in the IER and just as the GAS starts to ramp up, we are selling into it??
SANTOS get the benefit, not the poor ESG shareholders who just get a shafting and told it is a GREAT DEAL!!
How can something so blatantly obvious such as this TINTSFIELD example and the IER ruling the TRU energy transaction as NOT fair an reasonable to non SANTOS and TRU holders be "allowed" to go through??
WHAT AM I MISSING HERE ????????????????
Are the 9,900 ESG shareholders just going to take this crap and vote YES???????????
We should get hold of the register and do a mail out to every shareholder! $250 for the register + the mail out fee.
We collaborate to construct a letter advising holders to VOTE NO in the absence of an improved offer from SANTOS.
Voting NO and waiting for Tintsfield to start counting towards a real reserves upgrade is our upside!
But hang on a second, can't Origin see what we can see out of Tintsfield?? The reserves are starting to be booked, there is obviously gas in place, SLAP 90cents cash on the table!!
ESG Price at posting:
73.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
