I’m not sure it works like that - the law expects formal notice,...

I’m not sure it works like that - the law expects formal notice, not informal complaints or disputed emails. There needs to be clear proof of an actionable notice. If the situation was was clear at the time, why was injunctive relief sought not sought, and why did it take the Supreme Court to decide?

Then there are the payments, obligations and timelines - you can’t put projects on hold when there are internal shareholder spats.

In any case, as ever, let’s leave it to the arbitrator to work out.

Meantime, let’s focus on what you can answer - wa the newspaper lying when it said Billis was convicted for fraud? Is it defamation, and when will we see the retraction?