Maybe this is how Mr Solicitor of Lismore represents his victim...

Maybe this is how Mr Solicitor of Lismore represents his victim compensation clients. Oh you have incurred millions on a hospital bill but hey let's take hundred dollars because the cost you have incurred is a laughable claim and we shouldn't be asking for that.

Let's also get one thing clear here is that last week PH said in more than 10 years the company has spent the equivalent of $140 million in 2015 dollars over the 3 PEL's. Compensations is a totally different matter IMO should reflect the damages done to the company as a direct result government decisions including brand, the loss of revenue expected to earn by MEL if the disputed event had not occurred and the cost inured in reducing our losses.

I hope our legal team do not forget
- Every single cost incurred for Rosella in today dollar value
- Suspension wiped up to 40 per cent off Metgasco's share price
- The Minister damage to the brand for the public referral to the ICAC
- Loss of revenue from sales to the Dairies and CNG/micro-LNG sales
- Pipeline Sales
- and the list goes on....

I would also like to use our claims for losses that a reasonable person would anticipate in all the circumstances. In this case according to LTG 90+% reasonable person in the Northern Rivers believed that Metagsco would drill approx. 1,000 wells and account for $1billion+ in revenue.[/QUOTE]