Lets assume for one minute that the article is generally correct
it misses one crucial point ------------- history
the article basically says that the USA is dying - many would agree there - the only concern the article has is - how
it goes on to basically say that under democrats - there would be pocket wars and violent contest all over the place - not widespread civil war - but, under republicans there would be a drive to law and order (even in a dying empire).
ok - lets look at the evidence -------
under Obama - in a period of incredible economic stress ----------- did we see such violence??
No.
under Donald Trump - where no such economic stress exists - do we see such violence??
Yes.
That's pretty clear
What's also crystal clear is where both Presidents stood on promoting division and unrest ----------
Whoever is doing the rioting and violence atm - one thing is clear - it's Donald Trump who is actively encouraging it
Obama never did that - nor, is there any evidence that Harris (who the author suggests will be President) will do that.
So, the author is missing all the actual evidence - in favor of his 'opinion'.
One just cannot get away from the facts -- Obama had his watch and Trump has his watch ---------------- and, America is what it is under both of those administrations -
and, which is an uglier picture inside America is crystal clear
