@Hingdog Why would I defend it? The public broadcaster needs to be responsible for what it reports. In this case that means informing the public as to why a doctored piece of footage was put to air and holding to acccount (likely sacking) for those who produced or authorised the doctored footage going to air. At face value it looks like one over which heads should roll.
# couldn't post under reply button for some reason.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- ABC Admits Prior Knowledge of doctored audio gunshots
@Hingdog Why would I defend it? The public broadcaster needs to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)