Re "We can argue about whether or not locking down was necessary...

  1. 6,760 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 45
    Re "We can argue about whether or not locking down was necessary somewhere else, this thread is about the failures of the Andrews govt."

    There's plenty of other material to expose the Andrews's government. Riddled with incompetence in so many ways.

    My point is the Andrews's govt could and still should be able to point to the data and at least discuss the point that we are no worse off than last year. There is an argument to say that our mistake is to criticize and harangue Andrews now and force his hand into locking us all down again because we are not looking at the naked truth in front of us.

    No one in Australia under 42 has died, a handful of people under 60 have died. Without the hype and msm histrionics, who would be bothered by those numbers in a normal year?

    The failings of this government is the same as every other one who has locked down their people, ignoring the data and not allowing the scientists an open forum to explain and educate. Like sheep, we are just listening to a dumb politician and walking into economic disaster. That is the Andrews's governments failing.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.