Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Did you read the methodology? No matter, that model predicts...

First 9 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
jambo12

46,538 Posts.

1

31/10/16

00:22

Post #: 20237129
Share

Originally posted by sparassid ↑

From Primarymodel.com:

Lol, what an absolute joke. For one thing presidents running for their 2nd term almost always dominate their primaries or run unopposed, which means 2 or 3 of those correct 'predictions' are meaningless.

One only has to go back to 2000 to see that Al Gore got 75% in his primary while G W Bush got 62%, and Bush went on to win. But Primarymodel.com says they 'adjusted' their model (without saying how), to somehow predict this correctly. Uhhhh.. ok.

There is very little relationship between primary vote, or turnout, and general election results.

Expand

Did you read the methodology?
No matter, that model predicts Trump, you and NYT predict Clinton, we will see a week Tuesday.
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Trump chides Powell as Goldman call for calm. The RBA must be nervous

NMG

New Murchison Gold blasts off at Crown Prince as 'better than expected' results return

DMP

Is Domino's a steal after -25% plunge?

OSL

OncoSil wraps up recruitment for key pancreatic cancer trial

KGD

Kula picks up unexplored niobium play in Malawi, with surface samples logged

HotCopper Highlights, Week 27: G8 scalped, Domino’s drops the box, Gemlife brief hype & more

I88

Infini Resources onto Phase 2 at Portland Creek after spotting 'widespread uranium'

THL

Tourism Holdings says Liberation Day tariffs smashed US RV demand

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 016 – FY25 ended up not so bad... but Trump unpause is coming

Week 27 Wrap: 40% China tariffs?; ASX +10% FY25; US Amazon price spike

First 9 Last

SPONSORED BY