1. Appointment of Brett Smith as director 2. Appointment of...

1. Appointment of Brett Smith as director
2. Appointment of Myles Campoin as director

I don't know these people...Maybe time to Google them and find out their experience. If they are APAC people and NOT Independent then I'd say no to them. Just because AF picked them doesn't mean they aren't independent. I need this confirmed.

However, if they actually have gold experience and have made shareholders money then,
I'm happy to give them a chance. I don't judge people...I judge their actions. I think that's fair.Why hasn't ABM or APAC told us about them?

#1 If Independent and have success increasing shareholder value than yes. If APAC...no.
#2 If Independent and have success increasing shareholder value than yes. If APAC...no.


G'day Bill & ABU -share Holders, Have done some research on Brett Smith being
nominated by Andrew Ferguson therefore he being another of APAC's nominee's &
should Brett Smith & Myles Campoin both be voted in along with Andrew Ferguson -APAC will have taken over control of ABU as they will have control of ABU's -BOD
as they APAC will have 3 APAC nominee's as Directors out of the 4
directors on the ABU -BOD-
THIS IS TAKE OVER BY STEALTH WITHOUT HAVING TO PUT THRE
HAND IN THERE POCKET & PAY FAIR VALUE, reality being they-APAC
will control ABU with holding less than 15% of ABU'S share percentage ?WTF !!!!!!!!!!!
WAKE UP INVESTORS -imo all this craping on about PRC is a distraction to
what is really occurring & therefore implies motive.!!

Dragon Mining - Note MR Brett Smiths proposed appointment as ABU-Director
he is a Executive Director with Dragon Mining,
the Non Executive Chairman of Dragon Mining Limited -Mr Arthur George
Dew has been Chairman of the Hong Kong listed Allied Group Limited
(“Allied Group”) since January 2007. .
He is also the Chairman and a Non-Executive Director of Allied Properties (H.K.) listed companies in Hong Kong.
Mr Dew resigned as the Chairman and a Non-Executive Director of Hong Kong
listed Allied Overseas Limited in January 2014, he is also a Non-Executive
Director of ASX listed company Tanami Gold NL (ASX:TAM).

These individuals imo are all connected to the Allied group & APAC, imo they
have always had intentions to acquire not only ABU but TAM & in doing so
control the whole region, its not over yet litigation pending MLX-NST/TAM
-Andrew Ferguson att-being Director with MLX.

And out of sheer coincidence Mr Ferguson & APAC on the 13/02/2012 - ABM
and Tanami Gold signed a Memorandum of Understanding to work
collaboratively to investigate the processing of high grade-bearing
material from ABM's 100% owned Old Pirate Gold Prospect, both
companies are fully committed to this process.
The then Managing director of TAM was Mr Graham Sloan whom
ended up a director on ABU BOD & ABU changed its focus from
using the trial mining plant to process Old Pirate's Gold exactly
inline with the memorandum of understanding ?!- previously made
between ABU & TAM Directors-(two years before PRC became investors
in ABU)

As this had been agreed to & signed by ABU & Tam prior to the trial mining
of Old Pirate even taking place, every thing else is after this fact of reality
was downstream but obviously previously planned out when the agreement
was signed.
So imo they that signed were involved & made recommendations that eventually
became reality were the instigators & therefore PCR certainly was not an instigator
as it was over two years later after this agreement that they became share holders
in ABU!
There is reason & motive for imo things to have evolved in the manner they have!

i believe it to be likely PRC were played by APAC as investors in ABU -PRC did
not have a Director on the ABU-BOD at the time, APAC did have very good
connections with TAM & have Andrew Ferguson & Mr Graham Sloan as the
EX Managing Director of Tam on the ABU -BOD at the time of decisive change
of direction from utilising the trial mining plant- & instead utilising- exactly
as previously agreed the TAM -Coyote Gold processing Facility -

So ask yourselves whom HAD THE MOST INFLUENCE over events Tam & ABU
Directors-that's who-if trial mining results were a croc-( 17 g p/t) & how IMO could
they not be, as if they were not questionable how is it Old Pirate's - Gold Grams
per tonne recovery dropped through the floor when mineralised ore was processed
through the Tam owned Coyote treatment plant that had a much higher
recovery than the trial mining plant?
Yet the trial mining plants recovery-approx. reported 17g p/t g p/t exceeded
Coyote's-6g t/p/recovery, this is a huge margin of differential, its just now not
credible that such a huge amount of variance can occur, as it was mineralised
ore being processed from the same locations by two different plants !!
-come on guy's put this together.

APAC are intending to take over ABU'S -BOD & therefore control ABU with out
spending a dime & with only holding less than 15% of ABU-shares, so envisage
APAC controlling ABU & only holding 15% do we think APAC would want to drive
ABU's share price higher before they can acquire a higher percentage of holdings
in ABU ?!-"seriously"- come on? hello!!!!!!!!!
Research what happened to TAM when allied group loaned monies to TAM & the
squeeze began & were do we think the capital required will come from?
if APAC take control of ABU-WERE IS APAC's PLAN do you really think APAC
will give a sht about us as investors, it imo will just be more of the same -as the
massive amounts of precedence indicates.
Be aware that APAC has much to gain & therefore ABU investors should be
aware of the resulting consequences when voting electronically or at the G.M.
If your sixth sense is activated by what you have read I urge you to do more of
your own research & make a decision you are comfortable with, if that means
changing of the way you may have already voted then that is easy to change
prior to the G.M. there is much at stake for us all.

all above imo-dyor
gltah-exception being APAC
salt