Some may recall this article from April 23:
http://business.theage.com.au/opes-clients-legal-tangle-a-dilemma-for-the-courts-20080423-27ws.html?page=2
"In the netting-off scenario, if a client had vested say, $500,000 of shares with the company in return for borrowing $200,000 to buy more shares, they would only be able to claim $300,000; based on a 30% distribution, they would get only $100,000 back. If they could pursue their claim directly against ANZ or Merrill Lynch, they might — and only might — get 100% back."
So what if the shares you bought for $200k that were funded from Opes were reinvested back into the portfolio? Are they saying you don't get a return on that portion under liquidation? What if you then borrowed more money on that extra capital injection? Gotta say, I am still confused.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- abn
Some may recall this article from April...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ANZ (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$31.79 |
Change
0.540(1.73%) |
Mkt cap ! $95.05B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$31.17 | $31.88 | $31.17 | $198.3M | 6.264M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 10641 | $31.76 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$31.79 | 3000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 946 | 31.680 |
1 | 1000 | 31.570 |
2 | 1012 | 31.500 |
1 | 1000 | 31.470 |
1 | 750 | 31.410 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
31.820 | 2119 | 1 |
31.840 | 21 | 1 |
31.850 | 4435 | 4 |
31.860 | 1931 | 2 |
31.870 | 4800 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 06/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ANZ (ASX) Chart |