IMO immigration should based on the country's long term needs;...

  1. 22,906 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 769
    IMO immigration should based on the country's long term needs; not necessarily skills.
    Just look at what is happening now because foreign students (allowed to work 20 hrs/week)
    and backpackers (allowed to work for a year) has been snuffed out due to covid
    ......lower unemployment ....surprise, surprise?

    Just look at the mass migrants we got from Europe immediately post WW2 without
    skills screening (many had war skills like killing & demolition) but look at the next
    generation of which I'm sure many on these threads are descendants.

    IMO we simply should judge the longer term benefits of an immigrant comming
    from 3rd world countries who, (unlike Aussie born) haven't had the opportunity
    of free education and government subsidised training.

    My neighbour who is a Specialist doctor proudly recalls his father coming here
    with grade 6 education and an amazing will to work and now his son earns
    $500K/year.

    As a Psychiatrist he also marvels at how working class Aussies blame their
    lot on immigrants nicking their jobs rather than their employers nicking the
    the lions share of their labour and promoting excessive immigration rather
    than investing in upskilling our own.

    The majority of our home grown Uni graduates are women who specialise in areas other
    than engineering, metallurgy , manufacturing will lead the way in directions our
    future economic direction and unless the Government intervenes, we'll be
    a mob of service providers/consumers with multinationals owning the rest.

    IMO our greatest concern should be ownership of Aus; not the working stiffs!
    Last edited by moorookamick: 21/06/21
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.