Just had a read of osr1986 comments and confused on the comments.
Using 150m x 55m x 1700m x 3 SG = 42Mt.. not 20Mt as suggested
Last qtrly suggested mineralisation extends to a depth of 275m
therefore
275m x 55m x 1700m x 3 SG = 77Mt.. nearly 4 times osr1986 calculation
Not sure why the wording "up to" would upset. All this suggests is the widths are variable. I find alot easier to look at the significant intercepts to get a good feel of the continuity of widths and grades. Hard to believe 99% of results would be 1m wide. This is Fe not a Lodes style gold deposit
Agree however that there are alot more targets on the project that require drilling. Only time will let show the full potential of these
The use of Coffeys will give a good quality JORC complient resource estimate
Doesnt take much to see that this project has huge upside
Have been following this project from day one and have no intention of getting out yet
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
