in order to discuss a topic with any success, both have to be seeing it from a similar perspective or convention.
but an 'ism', or 'ist', is comparitively a very stupid topic, in the class of the most stupid and foolish
if you have ever being involved in an organization with a supposed set of dogma/doctrine, in time, you will notice that other folk's, in the same circle, interpretation of these dogma can be so diverse, as to make the entire concept laughable
perhaps tony fatoni calls himself a catholic and perhaps francis of assisi also calls him self a catholic, but their actions of body, speech and mind are as far apart and different as the south pole is to Cairo
if you reread 'my' post, again, 'you' have not bothered to answer an important question. what is the point of discussing anything with you if you religiously sidestep such issues?
