Academic slams tyranny of the greens

  1. 6,029 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 2
    Plimer’s thesis is that the real agenda of green groups (often registered as charities) is nothing less than the destruction of modern civilisation and that a key aim is to kneecap the global energy industry which provides society with electricity. It has always seemed odd that greens are so hostile to a gas which is vital for the life of trees. As a trained geologist, Plimer is well aware that the planet’s climate has been changing since its birth 4½ billion years ago. “If the Earth’s climate did not constantly change, then I would be really worried,” he says.
    What he contests is that manmade carbon dioxide has anything much to do with such change. It must be comforting for left-wingers to blame evil industrialists for destroying our planet, but in fact carbon dioxide accounts for only 0.04 per cent of the atmosphere and man-made carbon dioxide accounts for maybe 4 per cent of that, so Plimer regards the proposition as nonsense.
    Also, carbon dioxide emissions do not accumulate quickly in the atmosphere.
    After five to seven years, they are absorbed by the oceans, trees or rocks. Plimer believes that for scientists to argue that traces of a trace gas can be the driving force for climate change is fraudulent.

    The European Environment Agency has ruled that burning wood is carbon neutral because the carbon dioxide will be absorbed over time by the oceans or other trees.
    That leaves the EEA in the odd position of believing that a molecule of carbon dioxide emanating from wood behaves differently to a molecule emanating from coal.
    The greens, having achieved their aim, have stopped demonstrating although there is a strong argument that the conversion of Drax will make it more, not less, harmful to the planet.
    Wind farms and solar power stations are unreliable and totally unable to provide base load electricity.
    Plimer gives calculations which show that wind turbines are barely able to generate as much electricity in their lifetime as it takes to make them.
    . Even more bizarre was the Spanish solar plant which enjoyed such large subsidies that it could make profits generating electricity at night by shining floodlights on the panels. The floodlights were powered by a diesel generator. These are only three examples of green illogic from a book crammed with them.Plimer has assembled a massive case which needs answers.

    more here

    http://www.copyright link/p/national/academic_slams_tyranny_of_the_greens_BHcIY9m7CWk4WJeRFwH3dO
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.