Looool. Did you bother to read this article? 85% of that $65bn headline figure (that you googled) are “implicit subsidies” for (wait for it..) “poor health caused by air pollution, environmental damage and global warming”.
Looool. Did you bother to read this article? 85% of that $65bn headline figure (that you googled) are “implicit subsidies” for (wait for it..) “poor health caused by air pollution, environmental damage and global warming”.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
