Accelerate the World's Transition to Sustainable Energy - to fight Anthropogenic Climate Change, page-27607

In recent years, amid political backlash against alleged alarmism, scientists in their presentations to the public, have often used estimations at the lower end of probable changes. If you look at the IPCC 1990 publications and the subsequent reports, you find that later papers give lower estimations for increased temperatures, ocean levels and atmospheric turbulences, because pundits pointed to lots of possible processes which would slow down Global Warming or outright called the scientists liars and accused them of being paid off by Big Government or Global Wokeism or whatever the enemy du jour is.

30 years later, with actual results, we have to notice that the 1990 IPCC report was spot on, and the changes are rather at the upper end of the possible ranges. All the oh so important processes which would balance out the climate have been proven much to weak to change the trajectory as originally projected. The science was sound and made the right predictions, independent on what political propagandists were proclaiming.

Doesn't matter how much you deny zipper.