Bah - clean energy council - what a paid...

Bah - clean energy council - what a paid shrill....bahahahwhahahahah

No it is NOT...We have been done this before.

To get reliable 24/7/365 it is more expensive.

Replacing your wind & solar 5 times in 100 years,(adds to cost) network that has to be built out expanded (add to cost), plus having a batteries (adds to cost) (& replacing every 10 years ) & having a third back up (adds to cost) because you know you HAVE to have it.

Meanwhile Nuclear chuggs along producing No Co2 & 24/7/365 power with the need for constant renewing/ replacing & drain on the planets precious (& not renewal ) resources, that could/ should be put to a better use.

Just replacing the Hume interconnect is going to cost the consumer $20 /m...FOREVER.

2.5 Trilion dollars & unlikely to be 100% by 2050.....Nuclear a quarter of that cost & 100 year life.

Its a no brainer...........Nuclear, all the way. You know it, you need it.