Ok two things not good about this source:
1.) It's an article by a law firm
2.) It uses the Russian floating SMR as a case point
This extract from Reneweconomy sums the Russian SMR up pretty well:
"Russia’s floating nuclear plant is said to be the only operational SMR in the world, although it doesn’t fit the ‘modular’ definition of serial factory production.
A 2016 OECD Nuclear Energy Agency report said that electricity produced by the Russian floating plant is expected to cost about US$200 (A$273) / MWh, about four times higher than the target range cited by the MCA and more expensive than power from large reactors (US$129-198 / MWh).
Completion of Russia’s floating plant was nine years behind schedule and construction costs increased six-fold."
https://reneweconomy.com.au/small-nuclear-reactors-huge-costs/
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Accelerate the World's Transition to Sustainable Energy - to fight Anthropogenic Climate Change
Ok two things not good about this source:1.) It's an article by...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 25,108 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BGD
BARTON GOLD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Alex Scanlon, Managing Director & CEO
Alex Scanlon
Managing Director & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online