"If you actually read my post you would have understood. You would do well to read things twice before replying."
Well done on passing Stats 101 Daniel, however that logic is flawed when stacked up to Global Warming and climatic trends.
There is a host of information readily found that supports higher highs and higher lows.
Just with the Us across 1910-2020 - Big shift in trend post 1990 during summer, higher highs and higher lows.
https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-high-and-low-temperaturesGood article here too
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/the-decade-we-finally-woke-up-to-climate-change?loggedin=trueThe global temperature increase is not limited. The increase of CO2 concentrations is increasing global temperature and will continue to increase temperatures. You state that increase temperatures will have a positive to plant growth - but to what level of increased temperature? The rate at which this increase is occurring does not allow for organisms to adapt.
"Nice appeal to authority, but this is simple high school physics."
You are holding onto this Global Systems and wind power argument in the wrong context.
It's funny cause if you actually read your source you would see the breakdown of your argument
From your source - assuming that
all of US energy is produced by wind power (which would never happen anyway)
- increase of 0.24 degrees (that is
nothing compared to what is occurring with burning of fossil fuels)
- That is an increase over continental US assuming all energy from wind power and limited to 0.24degrees - much better than the continued increase temperature from burning fossil fuels.
- It plateaus at 0.24 degrees - that way better that what occurring currently!
The impact of wind power on global systems is miniscule of the greater impact of continued fossil fuel burning - your argument is stupid.
"So what percentage is, in which case, feel free to answer the questions regarding scale on this basis.Also explain how we're fulfilling the rest of energy demand."
Geee mate, keep up. It doesn't matter when weighed against the alternative continued burning of fossil fuels. It's a transition away from coal, gas and oil. Transition to more renewable generation and battery storage.
"If you don't understand the context of the question you can always ask. Misunderstanding or misrepresenting what someone is arguing or asking isn't a reflection on the person asking."
Again, egg on your face. Raw rotten egg on your face. While you ride your horse pompous pirate.
