Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Because its not Logarithmic, its Exponential.CO2 doesnt...

First 32647 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
SonicBlast

9,669 Posts.

39

25/04/24

18:27

Post #: 73512605
Share

Originally posted by Quatrojos: ↑

What amazes me is that alarmists consider the 4w/m/m forcing from every doubling of [CO2] to be significant, considering the above. We've roughly doubled [CO2] since the industrial revolution, meaning that we have increased forcing by ~2w/m/m (disregarding the logarithm). So, alarmists declare that an extra 2W/m/m, added to the normal 1000W/m/m (which fluctuates to the scale that causes 2W/m/m to be insignificant), has caused global boiling...

Fluctuations in solar radiation of ~ 10% of the forcing attributable to increased [CO2] occur regularly. Add the chaos of the hydrological cycle to the mix for some perspective on the declaration of the alarmists. The result is that statistically, the noise of the system is too loud to measure a peep from the 2W/m/m forcing from anthropogenic CO2.

Expand

Because its not Logarithmic, its Exponential.
CO2 doesnt dissipate.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 712 more messages in this thread...

First 32647 Last