Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Are they paid to be so intransigently stupid or just useful...

First 33133 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
dave sss

11,741 Posts.

160

01/05/24

07:10

Post #: 73596964
Share

Originally posted by bellcurve: ↑

Dave thanks for posting Doherty's tweet as a link to Blakers' rational analysis of actual demand for land to site renewable infrastructure.

nothing like the torch of rationality to shine a light into the darkness inhabited by neanderthals like Littleproud. To be kind to the bespectacled leader of the Nats, his stupid comments merely reflect the fact that his party has been bought and paid for by producers and exporters of coal, oil and gas.

to put it bluntly, he is theirs for as long as they want, then they'll flick him.

after your post of Doherty's tweet, we had one of our resident HC knuckledraggers, the antiscience antiknowledge Mudguts, calling bs on the tweet, without going into details at all.

i'm sure MG presents as a figure of authority as he pulls his head away from the bucket that clearly occupies so much of his time.

but here we have an image of an appalling dynamic evident in Australian society: an antiscience antiknowledge anonymous buffoon calls bs on two of Australia's leading scientists.

hard to figure why the buffoon is so up himself.

Expand

Are they paid to be so intransigently stupid or just useful idiots?

Who funds climate denial - see next tweet
3 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 1,589 more messages in this thread...

First 33133 Last