i got one word wrong. here it is again:
my above post in the second paragraph that refers to quasar making a comment that results in journalists writing something should actually say that a comment made by quasar may result in journalists writing something. i have no proof that the journalist comment example that i used is a direct result of the comments made by quasar.
ok now that that is done i would also like to add that i made an attempt to get a response from two journalists that wrote stuff that i thought was questionable but i didn't get any response. granted i did ask one journalist to pass on my request to the other journalist because i couldn't find his email address.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- Accounts don't lie
Accounts don't lie, page-71
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)