It is fascinating watching all the various media spin by special interest groups exaggerating a minor event - while considering the following.
1 - What would GAC have been paid by Ranger over the years ? Is there a record somewhere ? Ball park figure anybody?
2 - You would think there was no natural uranium outside the mine lease ?
3 - Is it not a fact that the Ranger operations are squeezed in on a ridiculously small mine lease - origins for that go back to the 1990's I assume.
If the deeps mine goes ahead - site problems would continue I assume, through crowding of facilities, variations in the wet season overloading dams etc.
Although I am a supporter of mining - is it not arguable that this project could be suspended on various technical grounds without harming the National interest.
I did own some ERA in another life - pre GFC I recall.
BTW - is the heap leach extraction working now ?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ERA
- acid spill - no enviro disaster etc but nasty
acid spill - no enviro disaster etc but nasty, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add ERA (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
3.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.64%) |
Mkt cap ! $664.4M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
3.1¢ | 3.1¢ | 3.0¢ | $10.09K | 331.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 881447 | 3.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
3.1¢ | 677483 | 5 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
6 | 881447 | 0.030 |
3 | 134384 | 0.029 |
11 | 936735 | 0.028 |
3 | 99152 | 0.027 |
2 | 45838 | 0.026 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.031 | 677483 | 5 |
0.032 | 200000 | 2 |
0.034 | 107437 | 2 |
0.035 | 50000 | 1 |
0.036 | 146272 | 3 |
Last trade - 11.54am 27/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
ERA (ASX) Chart |