Correction to the above:
Having re-read the proposed legislation, I have noticed that there is going to be no subsidy for those above 65k$/year who fail the test; I guess that group is going to be the biggest loser from this reform.
Overall, it still looks to me like a positive redistribution, though (not in the sense of fairness, but in terms of number of families benefitting vs number of families losing), therefore it is not obvious to me how this would be detrimental to expected revenue for childcare operators.
Any other views?
Correction to the above: Having re-read the proposed...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add GEM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.31 |
Change
0.025(1.95%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.060B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.28 | $1.32 | $1.28 | $1.475M | 1.134M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 16530 | $1.30 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.32 | 217583 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 17/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| GEM (ASX) Chart |