Share
7,016 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 52
clock Created with Sketch.
19/07/16
14:33
Share
Originally posted by eagle888
↑
Its amazing. Reading the stuff on this forum there appears
to be a pretence that Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party
is representative of mainstream Australia. The adulation
and misrepresentation is massive lol.
The truth is that based on AEC figures that One Nation
only received 1.14% of the primary vote in the House of Reps
and 4.27% in the Senate. These are national figures.
So that means that in the House of Reps 98.86% did not vote
for One Nation and in the Senate 95.73% did not vote for One Nation.
Yet here the concentration of supporters of failed ALA fringe group
have now switched to One Nation and peddle the lie that it is
representative of mainstream Australia.
The same concentration of Hanson One Nation supporters here
try to dismiss other parties as not being relevant or representative
of mainstream Australia when even the Greens whom they rubbish
out-polled them by far.
One Nation were NOT voted for by 98.86% of voters in the Reps
and NOT voted for by 95.73% in the Senate. They are the facts.
Its a fringe Party operating on a platform of fear and division with
a very small support base.
The official numbers tell the story.
Expand
"The official numbers tell the story ."
They sure do eagle' and if your 98.8% is correct then 1.2% voted for her ON candidates in the HOR and since Pauline only had ON candidates in 15 lower house HOR seats she could only mathematically get votes in 10% of the 150 HOR seats therefore One Nation must have got 12% of the vote in those 15 seats that ON contested.
WOW! Pauline's One Nation HOR vote surprised me!