Carbon credits from increased soil C will not drive demand for phosphate. Any savings of rock phosphate compared to MAP and DAP is because MAP and DAP contain nitrogen which is emissions intensive to produce. It is not comparing apples to apples.
The driver behind demand is normal agricultural production that requires P, and China cutting off supply. Absolutely prime opportunity to turn this company into something huge however history suggests that management lack the competence to implement that. Hopefully I am wrong.
Carbon credits from increased soil C will not drive demand for...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 67 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AEV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $11.74M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 5394896 | 0.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5¢ | 150000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AEV (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable