The article tries to make something of appointing a non big four auditor. This decision would have been made some time prior to the 2016 AGM.
I think implying that a company with a them small market cap, not much revenue or cash, should appoint a big 4 auditor is drawing a very long bow.
If they had appointed big 4 back then the shareholders may have described this as wasteful. Rightfully so.
Cheers
The article tries to make something of appointing a non big four...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 35 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)