Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

BIG

Click for more information

0.00%

$2.22 big un limited

AFR article, page-54

First 54 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
kittymittens

702 Posts.

81

03/01/18

15:05

Post #: 30014082
Share
Originally posted by 618600 ↑

***************************************************************************************************
Just because an audit report is stamped with the name of a big 4 does not mean it is all kosher.
***************************************************************************************************
PricewaterhouseCoopers negligent over Colonial Bank failure

PricewaterhouseCoopers offices in New York.

MICHAEL RAPOPORT

Dow Jones

12:00AM January 2, 2018

PricewaterhouseCoopers was negligent in connection with one of the biggest bank failures of the financial crisis, a US federal judge has ruled, opening up the Big Four accounting firm to the potential of hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.
PwC violated auditing rules and didn’t take steps that could have detected a $US2 billion fraud scheme that contributed to the 2009 failure of Alabama’s Colonial Bank, the judge ruled. The ruling last Thursday came in a lawsuit brought against PwC by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
US District Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein will now consider separately whether damages should be imposed on PwC, and how much. She dismissed other FDIC allegations against PwC, as well as allegations of negligence that Colonial’s bankruptcy trustee brought against the accounting firm.
A PwC spokeswoman said the firm “looks forward to the damages phase where the FDIC will bear the burden of proof on what remains of their inflated damages claim.” She said the firm was “pleased” that the judge rejected the other claims.
A spokesman for the FDIC declined to comment on the ruling.
The lawsuit concerns a fraud scheme centring on Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp, once one of America’s biggest mortgage companies. Taylor Bean was a major customer of Colonial’s and authorities have said Taylor Bean overdrew its Colonial account for years to cover its own cash shortfalls. The mortgage firm covered that up by, among other things, selling Colonial thousands of mortgages it had already sold to other investors, according to authorities.
After the fraud was discovered, Taylor Bean filed for bankruptcy in August 2009, and Colonial failed soon after, costing the FDIC’s deposit insurance fund billions of dollars. At least eight people, including Taylor Bean chairman Lee Farkas and two Colonial employees, were convicted or pleaded guilty to participating in the scheme.
PwC was the outside auditor for Colonial’s bank holding company, and gave Colonial clean audits that blessed its financial statements for years. The FDIC and the Colonial trustee had alleged PwC was negligent in not detecting the fraud scheme, and they sued the firm in 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Judge Rothstein agreed, saying PwC failed to design its audits to detect fraud, violating auditing standards. She also said PwC could have uncovered the fraud simply by inspecting some of the underlying documents for the mortgages at issue, but it didn’t.
But Colonial can’t recover damages because its hands aren’t clean, the judge said — its own employees were involved in the fraud, and the bank itself was negligent and its employees interfered with PwC’s audits, she said.
A related lawsuit against PwC by Taylor Bean’s bankruptcy trustee was settled for undisclosed terms in 2016.
In addition, PwC could still face a separate jury trial in Alabama over similar allegations from the FDIC and Colonial that concern part of the time PwC served as Colonial’s auditor. The allegations about PwC’s conduct during that time have been split off from the rest of the case for technical reasons.
Dow Jones Newswires

Expand

Well duh of course but if you're telling me that a top tier auditor adds no value then I guess my words are lost on you. I think you'll be hard pressed to make a case that a little bit paid extra wouldn't help considering much of the sophisticated/institutional investors would much rather see a global firm sign the dotted line...
BIG Price at posting: $3.63 Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

IGO

IGO kicks off earn-in copper drilling on-site Encounter's Yeneena play as it adopts new identity

HRZ

Horizon firms up ore reserve for Boorara ahead of FY25 Q1 development decision

MIN

MinRes jumps 5% as the company meets production guidance – depressed iron ore prices be damned

Nine's staff strike as Paris Olympic coverage begins

Capital raisings wrap: Brainchip, Ovanti, Lake and VHM

RHK

Red Hawk upgrades Blacksmith with DSO mineral resource at the Eagle Deposit

ASX Market Open: ASX200 to rise for Friday session | July 26

NVA

Nova locks in NASDAQ US market listing at a value of only US$3.3M as ASX gets quieter and quieter

MND

Monadelphous inks $200M contract with Woodside to help build Pluto LNG – but will it make Scarborough cheaper?

TRP

Tissue Repairs soars nearly 32% on TGA approval for wound healing gel

There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...

First 54 Last

Add BIG (ASX) to my watchlist