I was going to suggest we could put all the claims in a google doc and refute them but I actually think it's best we don't engage. He is a substandard journalist and I think it's better we don't help him. After you helped him find the audit all he did was change 1 sentence at the end of the article but kept the negative subtext throughout the original. He'll give up eventually because he's lazy and haphazard.
AFR Article, page-177
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 226 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)