I was going to suggest we could put all the claims in a google doc and refute them but I actually think it's best we don't engage. He is a substandard journalist and I think it's better we don't help him. After you helped him find the audit all he did was change 1 sentence at the end of the article but kept the negative subtext throughout the original. He'll give up eventually because he's lazy and haphazard.
AFR Article, page-177
Add BIG (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$2.22 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $388.8M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |