Looks like we should start a thread where someone sensible can explain how effectively losing ~half (35% + abatement / disposal costs) of any reported gas flows due to CO2 content will impact on Jaws project viability? Attempting to make light of it wont answer the fundamental question. This issue seems to have been swept under the carpet but its not going away.
Looks like we should start a thread where someone sensible can...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add STX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
18.5¢ |
Change
-0.015(7.50%) |
Mkt cap ! $530.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 19.0¢ | 19.5¢ | 18.5¢ | $3.622M | 19.18M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | 1678858 | 18.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 19.0¢ | 616306 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| STX (ASX) Chart |