I still wonder why FMG would allow Gina to get to 25% if they...

I still wonder why FMG would allow Gina to get to 25% if they intend to take full control of AGO.

It makes it so much more difficult if you have a 25% holder. They cannot be pushed out or unseated. Special resolutions can't pass and Court ordered compulsory acquisitions can't be initiated.

If you want to take it over you shouldn't allow a competitor to get to 25%.

I don't know what to make of FMG's strategy. So far it just looks like a very expensive seat at the competitors table...

What am I missing?