afr - latest, page-26

Westcott that's contrary to their performance reports I've read recently that blamed poor performance of the fund on the delay in the takeover
Ie they wanted completion, they wanted 45
Give me a spell
Any fund worth their salt would not have been a holder if they didn't believe in the takeover, that would be a method for poor performance
As we have seen
If you are correct eim must be morons, no professional money should have been in sdl if they were not looking for completion