Finally, an AFR article on CGA, CTN and NAOS. But its just Rear...

Finally, an AFR article on CGA, CTN and NAOS.
But its just Rear Window AFR acting as apologist for George Boo.
Not one bit of independent, investigative research.
Performance fee is a side show, Myriam. Why, no mention of poor performance of CGA as manager of CTN. No mention of poor decision of CTN board removing OC costing millions. No attempt to explain why CTN Board not looking after its own shareholders but instead looking after CGA shareholders. No mention of extended IMA term for NAOS. Etc

Fairfax, your journo needs to walk the plank. Mouthpiece reporting. Needs to understand that CGA and CTN are two seperate and independent companies.