What? You mean to say you've never heard of the 4-month-old director appointment pump?
Quite the particularly odd response to the query, it seems like they actually believe today's action is justified. If you look back, there was not nealy as significant volume from the market when they were announced initially, but somehow now it's worthy this kind of action? Seen some strange responses from companies before, but this one... They'd have been better off going the Schultz route imo.
