exactly @wenty, the other alternative is to look at profit per...

exactly @wenty, the other alternative is to look at profit per tonne. This would allow us to be the big end of the graph. Imagine putting profit per tonne in a graph like we have seen the resources displayed, where the bigger the resource the bigger the ball on the graph. If we are the big ball (which we would be based on profit per tonne), it instantly grabs attention as people are used to seeing CXO as the small ball. IMO, It would raise questions in an instant as to why CXO is now the big one and creates the impact I think we need. Your graph is excellent, but if someone is flicking through a presentation, they may be used to seeing CXO at the lower end of bar graphs and therefore not fully grasp the impact of what they are reading. Just another way of looking at it, perhaps an advancement on the earlier theory?