Not trying to skirt around the question but for me it is very hard to compare purely because I got more out of the time I spent with GC and Josh than I did the AGM. I didn't get that opportunity this time.
I would say that this time they were all keeping there cards close to their chest. I fine with that but it makes it hard to compare to when more info was provided.
Hangas to expand on POC1 - Geoff did say nothing was wrong. He just dodged the questions about version 1 and whether we are involved. The bit I found a bit odd was that it appeared that the relationship between ADO and POC1 (the deal negotiators rather than scientists) wasn't as strong as I envisaged. Geoff could have been talking using past tense as well but I could be sure either way. Couldn't really get a read on the body language either.
Maybe others could who were there could give their opinions as well.
AGM review, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 42 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
