Shareholders could at least follow up on the newspaper article...

Shareholders could at least follow up on the newspaper article that indicated revenue is expected 1st quarter 2017. That information has already been published publicly, so elaborating on whether that is solely the 200,000 wands or if it *may* include other things shouldn't be that much of a stretch.

If they can't even answer that question at the AGM then I'd seriously reconsider the level of shareholder communication (and thus my belief in the company's management). Commercial confidence is fine, but management should be able to give a straight answer about things they've said in a newspaper interview. That's what the AGM is for, right?