PPP pan pacific petroleum nl

agm -why the need for this item?

  1. 13,793 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 437
    Item 4 – Renewal of Proportional Takeover Provisions
    A special resolution is being put to shareholders under
    sections 136(2) and 648G of the Corporations Act to amend
    the Company’s Constitution by renewing the existing Rule 7
    of the Constitution. A special resolution must be passed by at
    least 75% of the votes cast by shareholders of the Company
    who being entitled to vote on the resolution do so at the
    meeting in person, by Proxy or by submitting a direct vote.
    Rule 7 formed part of the Constitution adopted by
    shareholders in October 2000. Under its terms, and in
    accordance with the Corporations Act, Rule 7 ceased to
    apply in October 2003. Rule 7 was renewed for a further
    3 year period by shareholders from November 2008 to
    November 2011.
    If renewed by shareholders at the meeting, the Rule will
    operate for a three year period from the date of the meeting
    (i.e. until 8 November 2014), subject to further renewal.
    A copy of the Constitution can be obtained by contacting
    the Company.
    The Corporations Act requires the following matters to be
    advised to shareholders in relation to a proposed resolution
    to adopt proportional takeover bid provisions:
    Proportional Takeover Bid
    A proportional takeover bid is an off-market takeover bid
    where the offer made to each shareholder is only for a
    proportion of that shareholder’s shares (i.e. less than 100%).
    Accordingly, if a shareholder accepts in full the offer under a
    proportional takeover bid, the shareholder will dispose of the
    specified portion of the shareholder’s shares in the company
    and retain the balance of the shares. The Corporations Act
    allows a company to include in its constitution a provision

    which enables the company to refuse to register a transfer of
    shares under a proportional takeover bid, unless a resolution
    is first passed by shareholders approving the offer. This is
    what Rule 7 is designed to achieve.
    Effect of Proportional Takeover Provisions
    If a proportional takeover bid is made, the directors must
    ensure that a meeting is held more than 14 days before the
    last day of the bid period, at which shareholders will consider
    a resolution to approve the takeover bid. Each shareholder
    has 1 vote for each fully paid share held. The vote is decided
    on a simple majority, and will be binding on all individual
    shareholders. The bidder and its associates are not allowed
    to vote. If the resolution is not passed, no transfer will be
    registered as a result of the takeover bid and the offer will
    be taken to have been withdrawn. If the resolution is not
    voted on, the bid is taken to have been approved. This in
    effect, means that shareholders as a body may only prohibit
    a proportional takeover bid by rejecting such a resolution.
    The directors will have breached the Constitution if they fail
    to ensure the requisite resolution is voted on. If the bid is
    approved (or taken to have been approved), all valid transfers
    must be registered. The proportional takeover approval
    provisions do not apply to full takeover bids.
    Reasons for Proposing the Resolution to Renew Rule 7
    The directors consider the renewal of Rule 7 to be in the
    interests of the Company. In the directors’ view, shareholders
    should have the opportunity to vote on a proposed
    proportional takeover bid. A proportional takeover bid for
    the Company may enable effective control of the Company
    to be acquired without shareholders having the opportunity
    to dispose of all their shares. The shareholders could be at
    risk of passing control to the bidder without payment of an
    adequate control premium for all their shares, being locked
    into a minority position in the Company or suffering loss if
    the bid causes a decrease in the market value of the shares.
    Rule 7 will prevent this situation occurring by permitting
    shareholders to decide whether or not a proportional
    takeover bid should be allowed to proceed.
    Presently Proposed Acquisitions
    As at the date of this notice, the directors are not aware of
    any proposal by any person to acquire, or to increase the
    extent of, a substantial interest in the Company.
    Potential Advantages and Disadvantages
    The potential advantages of the proportional takeover bid
    provisions for the directors and shareholders respectively
    of the Company are as follows:
    • shareholders have the right to decide by majority vote
    whether an offer under a proportional takeover bid should
    proceed, which is likely to ensure that an intending bidder
    structures its offer in a way which is attractive to a majority
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.