CD, I too want answers to questions. Eg. how in a couple of...

CD, I too want answers to questions. Eg. how in a couple of months the situation can go from Shougang deal in pocket ( and if that falls over we have plans B,C,D etc so don't worry) to basket case.Another might be eg.How come the 70 or so expressions of interest in the Rincon offtake, whittled down to 13 whittled themselves down to zero??

We shouldn't let them off too easily, and just because someone says that they can't answer a question doesn't mean they should be believed. It is most probably another lie,and an avoidance of the truth or some other embarrassing fact. The next obvious question to a director who says that he can't answer a question is "why not?" and if he says that he doesn't know then someone needs to make the next question "when can you find out and post the answer on the website?" etc so as to keep the pressure on and so that we always have something to slap the scum around the head with , to keep them on the back foot and on the defensive.Let's make this AGM a day that they will remember. Plenty of impolite questions re PT and why weren't the board aware of what was going on etc.That is not to say we should be overly abusive( slightly or moderately abusive is fine by me) but simply to keep the pressure on in such a way that we get real answers that satisfy us.
Remember that it is us who have lost money, who have been mislead(over and above all the normal risks of business and investing) and we have a right to answers. directors are supposed to represent shareholders interests and what were they doing???We don't need to hamper ourselves with notions of "professionalism" or "civility" or "politeness" or any other such rubbish.Under
the circumstances an "open and robust exchange of views"is what is required.