Unfortunately for you I was 100% correct. There was no big...

Unfortunately for you I was 100% correct. There was no big buyer.

Instead there was an insider who bought $50k of shares.

You wouldn't class someone buying 0.0015% holding in the company a big buyer would you? Adding to his 0.012% overall holding ? LOL

I never said there would be no insider buying, I said there were no 'big buyers' for the company as evidenced by the extremely low volumes traded overall.

Ironically, this announcement puts the 23% increase you asked about in perspective, since the volume and supply was so low that Peter Nathan making one modest purchase could significantly shift the SP.

I guess through your lens it must be high conviction insiders buying, but the context makes it look an awful lot like insiders trying to prop up a share price against the prevailing market trend.