re: aim --- for parkerkeith
As a long term holder, it seems to me that the smae old frenzy is occurring with this unbelievable insecurity about the ability of bauxol to deliver the goods.
It seems to me that the process is proven - the big question is not whether bauxol can fix the problem but whether it is cost effective to use bauxol in situ to fix the problem or cart all the material away, where it still needs to be managed anyway. The report that i read is just one guy making a bland statement about the time it has taken to fix the problem and stating that bauxol maybe wasn't going to be the solution, even before the data concerning their field test has been released - just one small preliminary result is all his assertion was based on. As the Prof said, they could do better - and why shouldn't they - first time bauxol used under these conditions, they will learn from what they have done and will clearly suggest an improved plan, a cost and hopefuly then get a contract for part all all of the project- if it is cheaper and better that the other alternatives. As they appear to have shipped a huge amount of bauxol to the site, it would seem sensible to use it!!
A lot of ill-informed commetn yet again about this product. Lot of very insecure people out there who don't know how business really works - it all takes a lot of time to spend public money, especially when it may be spent on an overseas product and there are self-interested competing parties on the ground.
Woof Woof
VTI Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
