All conjecture over success or lack there of can be allayed by...

All conjecture over success or lack there of can be allayed by the company if they choose to.

They could quite easily craft an announcement for release via ASX that perhaps relaxes their stringent protocols whereby they only release if an IP agreement is signed. But, of course, they simply don't care that shareholders are anxious. I think they truly believe they are working in the best interests of shareholders with their current IR regime.

So many questions and so little opportunity to have them addressed. For example why do we still have an office in Perth (Technology centre) when the new CTO is based in California?

Why is the global head of IR based in Perth? Put another way, why isn't the company basing its head of IR close to the action that is head office in California so that a higher level of understanding of the business is one of the key advantages that can then be utilised to craft consistently better messaging?

Where is our new CMO? Why can't we find anyone to fit this role?

What is happening with new versions of Akida?

I could go on but it seems pointless.

in the interim JYOD.