Here something contentious.
No NG for stocks above asx300 either?
Houses tend not to lose 100% of value (land value only) so maybe cgt should be readdressed
Basically comes down to where is the balance/or should it be mandatory that 5% of new construction be public housing (not 10% affordable). and 5% affordable.
Albanese and Negative Gearing, page-50
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 102 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)