"no, it is not" Then perhaps to you it is sound to hold people responsible for what their much more powerful services providers do, but thankfully our legal system does not agree with your stance. It recognises the power disparity between the service providers and customers and in principle does not attribute guilt by association.
"and, thankfully attendances are dropping like flies falling when hit by mortein" Their diminishing numbers is immaterial to the point of our discussion.
You are judging them without knowing or understanding their beliefs, so it is only natural that you would hold misconceptions. Rather than reflect on this possibility, you prefer to double-down and demonstrate that you could not assimilate any new knowledge on the topic.
Ultimately, would you like to be known as a person who, without rudimentary knowledge of religious dogma, thinks that religious people are "very dangerous"? I ask this with sincerity.
