Thanks BrayWyatt Until recently I havent held that much. Having...

Thanks BrayWyatt

Until recently I havent held that much. Having been in the corporate sphere for a very
long time, in that I understand many people have been asking they claim they have them,
yet won't post them here - I'm reluctant to add to company woes hassling them as
others have... I did post top 20 a little while back from 2 periods.

There are people here who make claims from their copy of the content of the top 50,
but refuse to post them, despite being directly asked. I have seen a recent top 50 at
an investors group I visit once a week but, the numbers didn't tally one bit !

Oddly it overplayed my own holdings (+ 50%) & incorrectly massively downplayed the holdings
of the only other 2 entities I know personally. I wasn't allowed to photocopy or take a picture
& didnt get any reasonable response when I asked why. Something weird going on and in my
decades of dealing with the tax office it just doesnt gel the assertion of a director he
had an unplanned tax bill which meant some 16M+ shares went from locked up in
corporate governance to be open to dump willy nilly, eg see more volatility since
then - that doesnt make sense in relation to a claimed "strategic investor".

I've had strategic investors - they add value to the co with specific proposals/effort, we
see none of that and who is it strategic for that 16M+ more shares are loose ? Not a good
corporate decision when tax bills can be managed otherwise & prepared for months ahead
so the market doesn't end up getting an extra reason to be even more volatile...

I can only infer we can't believe what people claim here, lots of odd spruiking which is
mere sentiment not tangible ignoring the balance of upside, its level re cash positive
vs risk management credentials with the bigger investors really expect, that is lacking
here such as regression testing reports and many technical factors not addressed or even
minuted as far as I can see... I enjoy travel & will be at the AGM for damn sure
and have a long list of key questions and a couple of proxies as well

I've elsewhere asked hotcopper consider setting up/asking lead co's for the top 50 on
a regular basis & posting it as an aid to transparency, what we rather obviously see
is that 16Mdump isnt helpul - ie some "person" claimed its "good for the company" but,
he refuses to comment why despite direct questions...

My interest on this thread is to overlay the delta top 50 on the day to day charts to
pin down likely whos messing with the market - despite it being very good for me recently
it has me worried for all which puts the company in a difficult position, I really hope there
is not complicity. If the amount the directors are paid were a bit more reasonable I'd
probably not add that to the pile which if something "else" happens might well smell...