Alk Chart, page-231

thinking same about 65/66 but my take is they are going to use 1 rig to extend both of those holes while second rig will be used to drill another one 100m strike from 59 and will be either parallel to 59 or 58. Therefore all three holes will be completed about same time and sent to the LAB for assaying. ALK will probably ask for these holes to be give priority over other holes..

Basically I have no doubt 65/66 mineralisation is same we are seeing from 59 but I think it trend north/west and 65/66 might have been drilled bit too far south. Especially 66 and when extended these holes (with 66 as higher probability) may not show the best grades at debt. 66 may even exit the zone not long after it hits it as it will enter about half way into the zone rather than from the start of the zone.. hope I am clear what I am trying to say.
They may have to drill another hole roughly about 100m behind 65 for best results..

All speculation and assays will tell us what is going on..