all opes client entitled for refund of all tax, page-22

  1. 1,030 Posts.
    ANZ are saying once they were lodged w ANZ "they owned them" absolutely

    So ANZ didnt notify ASX wrt to "Ownership" for up to 4 yrs
    This silence causes the scheme to get off the ground

    ANZ didnt understand its tax position and were silent
    This silence causes the scheme to get off the ground

    ANZ executives Co Marketed w Opes and were silent on "ownership" being absolutely transferred
    Their participation and silence causes the scheme to get off the ground

    Contributory negligence comes to mind

    Or was it just a fancy margin loan really..with ANZ recognising beneficial ownership resided with the client

    So by their actions(estoped) , they thought at the time it was this is how it worked
    And the plods at ANZ Insitutional Lending didnt understand it either..

    I cant believe ANZ would actually be negligent for say 250 substantial shareholder notices (inc adjustments) and about 7 positions over 20%
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.