All publicity is good publicity, page-8

I acknowledge your appreciation and I reciprocate. You are *again* being presumptuous with your assertion I am "angry", so now you stand corrected *again*.

I see you've drawn the very LONG BOW *again* on the circumstances of other suspensions and ISX. Sometimes it is difficult or unplalatable to digest others input, so please reread as many times as possible the following post #: 40813161.

You've drawn another fallacious conclusion on the likely outcome of a suspension, based on a dataset of 2 (GSW and BIG). As a chartered accountant I would have thought you would have least brushed against the fundamentals of statistical studies and in particular the sample size required to determine a probable outcome +/- x%. Further and more importantly, all of the relevant inputs that determine the likely outcome.

For your convienence please read Post #: 40806772 as an opportunity to develop the necessary nuance to appreciated what I've just said.