Um...wrapping my head about what you said...So, if a client does not meet SPX criteria they will pass it on to somebody else more gullible? and get a commission to do so...and if they default because of that referral..? I am curious why someone else would take on a risk from me that I deem unacceptable with no safeguards - and pay me to do so .
You are completely correct about interpretation - all I ask is you open your mind to other possible interpretations when many facts are absent...
Just discussing the stock after all. Yep, a stock I don't currently hold....does that really matter? I have a tiny bit of knowledge about MOT/CRO/SPX and will critically read Anns without rose tinted spectacles. Perhaps if the ann said that SPX was giving them their proprietary algorithm that guarantees no defaulters then maybe (LOL) I would sagely nod and say 'fair enough' and good deal....Though why would SPX refer anybody? Keep potential customers to themself?
Hey, again just IMO as I am Ballsup after all
Cheers,
Ballsup - by name and nature, IMO, NFA and as usual NFI
SPX Price at posting:
0.9¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)